@ahmadmanga, you’re right: my earlier reply understated the danger of an enemy gaining a decisive advantage—future cooperation means little if you cannot survive the present. But “you have to weaponize it too” follows only if weaponization offers the safer payoff; that incentive structure is what makes it a Prisoner’s Dilemma, not hostility alone. My argument should have been narrower: cooperation needs verification and safeguards that change those payoffs, not faith in an enemy’s promises. If cheating is undetectable and grants decisive superiority, your objection stands.