I've read a few of the opposing articles and most of them were like carbon copies of each other. To me, this shows signs of a collective narrative disseminated by whoever dictates what gets reported. Many even stated that their narrative was dictated by the Judge's decision, a judge who was found guilty of misconduct. Mainstream reporters are extremely controlled when dealing with family court proceedings and when they push someone to the point where they speak out publicly it is often the case that the MSM is used to smear that person in order to protect the reputation of the establishment. On the subject of people speaking out, you have to understand how the family courts and Social services manipulate the secrecy of their profession. They leave parents terrified and feeling as if they have nobody to turn to. Local MPs won't help and any complaints about the Social workers have to be directed to the head of Social Services, and there is no chance they will ever admit they have got things wrong or covered things up. In the end, parents lose their children and then have nothing left to lose. The consequence of this is that they have to resort to turning to the "internet talk show circuit" for there to be any hope and sometimes just so when the child grows up he/she knows mum/dad actually never gave up. Neither of us knows 100% if Samantha Baldwin is telling the truth or not but because I've seen first-hand how corrupt the authorities can be I believe her story. I understand that it's an extreme story but things like this aren't unheard of. In fact, it is more often than not that an abuser will come from an abusive family.