After reading your reply my first impression was that you had done some research on this subject(Well, actually my first impression was made after your remark "Of course, you know me". -Erm, no I don't. But am I supposed to? There are other comments you make that point towards a large ego but let's brush over that) As I was saying, it appeared you had looked into this and given a detailed response. So, you know me, I looked into what you said, and low and behold, the first article to pop up on google parroted what you said(Or should I say, you parroted what it said). Being someone that has personally dealt with how the Social Services, Police, and family courts work in matters like this, it doesn't surprise me to find that the first article that's on public show is one that supports the Authorities. Google has a well-known track record for suppressing real journalists, especially when it's about child abuse. Maybe a better source you could have found would be that of Richard Carvath, the journalist who uncovered this story and also won an appeal against the corrupt conviction leveled against him. Or you could look for the many articles detailing Judge Jeremy Lea and how he has been found guilty of the accusations of corruption and others that detail his continued failures within the family courts. But then again, I know you, and due to how "you know" for certain, just from watching one video and reading the first article that pops up on google, that you won't bother to consider that maybe you've judged this one wrong. Anyhoo, I won't waste any more time with this reply and you are welcome to voice your own opinion.