No, it isn't. You're using that image to deceptively drive the point that we're somehow being "lied" to. It makes you appear as a Flat Earth proponent — don't do that. The reason why the two Earths look as different as they do is because they're edited and digitized, but that doesn't make them fake. Your phone has a digital camera, and you can edit photos on it, but that doesn't make them any less real than a photo taken with an optical camera. NASA did this because they wanted to show how the Earth appears with more or less clouds; the second Earth especially had less clouds to show more of the oceans.

Science hasn't changed at all. It is still about making hypotheses, predictions, theorizing, testing experiments, and seeing if these hypotheses are true. Faith has nothing to do with what modern Science is teaching us, and trying to equate scientific textbooks to the Bible (which has been disproven ad infinitum because of Science) is just asinine. Science isn't a religion, and it has never been one. There is no book that scientists have faith in because Science requires that faith should be excluded entirely. You have no idea how Science works.

We did went to the Moon. It's a scientific fact. No, it isn't impossible to get pass through the Van Allen Radiation Belts because you have to be in the belts for an extended period of time in order to suffer any substantial effects. Do you even know how to research? Quote-mining isn't proof of anything. Don Pettit said we don't have the technology to go back to the Moon, but that doesn't mean we can't recreate that technology, it's just much, much more expensive than it was 50 years ago. There's no reason for a 7th Moon landing.

Neil Degrasse Tyson didn't make a mistake when he said the Earth is oblate. NASA isn't educating that Earth is "perfectly-round". The Earth only looks "perfectly-round" because its origin of flattening is so small that it's negligible. Scientists once thought it was a perfect sphere, as well, before we had the ability to properly model the Earth's shape. Also, there are thousands upon thousands of images of our planet. It's quite foolish to think that every single one of them is Photoshopped or CGI.

You're asking why we have "perfect" images of the other planets, but not Earth? NONE of them are perfectly-round, and there is no such thing as a perfect image. A planet's oblateness isn't noticeable; why can't you comprehend this very simple observation? Jesus Christ...

All of your questions and concerns could have been easily answered by a simple Google search. And conspiracy theories should at least be viewed with strong skepticism. Much of them are conjured up by people who have no prior knowledge to the so-called "lies" and "secrets" they're trying to "expose".