Sometimes it is funny for myself with the posts of netizens who are politically aware.
Moreover, now the viral UAS case is estimated to be a CAWAPRES.
That alone reaps the pros and cons.
For me personally the pros and cons themselves are common in responding to statements.
But the funny thing is, there are just the actions of the counter netizens without knowing what the decision means, so that "disbelieving" the statement even "condemns" those who follow and hope that the statement is not just an expectation.
"Ustadz is not allowed to do politics, just lecture alone. If the cleric becomes a vice president who will preach and guide us? Geez, the sign of doomsday if scholars have politics" and various kinds of baseless egoistic reasoning.
Do you know that this is a ULAMA IJTIMA that has a specific purpose?
Do you feel your reason and scientific concept are caliber with the scholars?
Do you not trust the clergy?
In my mind only 2 for that person:
