Thanks for the link.
Interesting how they say “highly likely that such claims are false”. But then they say absolutely at the end "VERDICT
False."
Is it highly unlikely, or false?
I didn't really see anything in that link you gave me that proved the claim wrong especially since this is supposed to be new technology that most people don't really understand yet.
Here's a link to the study they did in Mexico, feel free to watch it and then tell me what you think. You can also find more videos of people doing this if you look by typing in stuff like "covid mac addresses" or "vaccine wifi addresses" or "covid bluetooth"
They show that people who haven't been vaccinated or PCR tested don't show a reading and people who have do, they even go to a cemetery and can't find any signals before 2021, but find numerous from 2021 to 2022...
I kind of doubt they are just making this up.
I am open minded to there being some kind of confusion, however... At this point in time I'm not 100% convinced either way.
Would be good to see another actual study being done somewhere else in the world.
RE: Surveillance under the skin?