Those are your beliefs and they don't match with what I just told you as I never said I believe and accept those explanations.

I do find it interesting that you claim these things like I've been programmed to believe and accept explanations and all that kind of stuff when you don't seem to have much of a grasp of weather science and how pockets form in the atmosphere and numerous other things like that and you can't prove the claims you are making, but... You know... You saw some conspiracy videos on YouTube and you've seen some trails in the sky, so... I guess you're right and anyone who disagrees is programmed?

When other people don't bow down to what you claim is truth, you insult them and say they are programmed and all that, yet... In all reality. How much of what you claim can you actually truly prove?

I'm interested in the truth, you can insult and try to psychologically manipulate and use jackal language all you want, however... What's any of that mean if you can't prove what you're saying is true? And you know what they say about insulting language, it's usually used because someone's argument is lacking. If you have to resort to insulting people, your argument probably isn't that great.