I don't want to get in a long drawn out debate about this because I don't have much time right now, though you did invite me over here and I figured I'd respond to a couple points.
You will see that for something to possess a quality, it is necessary that such a quality exists.
Or a "perception" of a quality exists.
Now, once and for all, we can say that we have resolved the questions regarding this issue, and we can say without fear of making a mistake that none of these ideas is relative or subjective, and that on the contrary they are all objective
I actually think they might be both objective and subjective or perhaps even more. In my research I've found things are often a mix or combination or shades of grey and not so black and white.
I respect your belief though. :) I don't have any desire to try to prove what I've said as I think some issues are beyond the ability for humans to prove. I try to stay open minded and consider the possibilities and the more I learn in life the less I realize I know.
PS... Good article by the way. I did appreciate it and I agreed with a lot of what you said even if I'm not in 100% agreement. Peace!
RE: Is the good relative? Is it the justice? The Beauty?: An analysis on relativism