RE: RE: Tourism on wheels getting to know the Supreme Court of Justice of Chile. (ENG-ESP)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Tourism on wheels getting to know the Supreme Court of Justice of Chile. (ENG-ESP)

Words
84
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
4y

Our apologies dear osita21@osita21 for the misunderstanding. For your information, you have properly followed this rule by just using Wikipedia and other online sources as your notes/references, without copy-pasting written texts from them and placing them in your posts, plus you also shared your personal impressions of the featured architecture.

The main point here is to remind you to use your original composition of words which you mentioned and which we are glad that you are already doing. Does this explanation still confuse you?

@aplusd: Our apologies | Ecency