RE: RE: How Vote Incentivization Monopolizes Delegated Proof of Stake
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: How Vote Incentivization Monopolizes Delegated Proof of Stake

anyx(69)
Published in
#dpos
Words
84
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

No, that's not correct. In traditional PoS, your expected value of staking is directly proportional to your staking amount. The effect of compounding sounds like an issue -- but what you find is that with a probabilistic system the smaller stakers still, on average, approach the same rate of compounding as well.
So long as a large staker and small staker are always staking, their rewards are proportional. There's a bit of statistics involved if you want to prove it, but it is true.

@anyx: No, that's not | Ecency