RE: RE: The Daily Meme #340!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Daily Meme #340!

Words
242
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
5y

Spaminator is often used to mark accounts for further review.
As long as your rewards are not going to zero you can ignore it.
It is a dust vote.

I know this may come as a surprise to some folks, but the 'anti-abuse' community is finally reaching the point that it can see the light at the end of the tunnel.
This means that some accounts that have not been scrutinized in the past are getting looked at now.

If you are gonna post the utubs of others, best practice is to add much commentary that is original.
Posting content of others is questionable, so you have to make substantial effort of your own to justify rewards.
Often your curators don't take the time to check up on you, then they feel bad when they find out that you have not been creating the content yourself.

I was a victim of this about a year ago, I clearly marked the content as not mine, but still I had someone say that they thought it was original to me.
I got flagged over it.
Now I burn rewards on that type of content.

I think reviewing and reformatting this type of content has value for the community, but other don't.
Just as your memes bring value, for me.

It is a community decision that hivewatchers enforces.
Until we have enough stake to make our own rules this is what we have to do.

@antisocialist: Spaminator is | Ecency