Without these people the "workers" would have NOTHING!
Well, truthfully, they would have only what they could manage on their own.
I'll concede the need for leadership in a group endeavor, however, I don't agree to the crapitalusts' offer on the split of the value created.
One without the other has nothing.
Together they can have anything in the world, why does only one of them get that kind of life?
Because fu, that's why.
Lick boots, slave.
Let me shove my cop down your throat.
Oh, you want to push back do you?
Now we send in the troops.
Is that the split of the worker's work you want to defend?
The workers pay the costs of their imprisonment?
Better we all cooperate, and share, iyam.
The matrix camouflages the doorway out, it has to.
I question the things I dismiss out of hand.
It's an acquired talent.
Not incentivized within the matrix.
RE: What is Communist Anarchism, cont'd.