Are you capable of coding curation rewards for down voters?
I'm not.
However, an ability to deliver doesn't put a cork in creativity, that I can tell.
Why are down votes discriminated against?
Are they second class votes?
'Good people don't down vote!'
Smdh, didn't we fork off from those folks?
I mean, you can't fix stupid.
Ignorance can be educated, but stupid sticks.
What? You a hater?
I bet I've thrown more flags than most of you reading this combined have.
I was throwing them when they still had a cost.
I was there when Anthony began creating SFR for us.
I follow multiple down vote trails.
You should, too.
Imo.
Well, now we got a chance to make a real crab bucket out of the rewards pool.
Instead of down votes being a cost of defending the price, they can be a source of rewards for community members willing to fly the flag.
If the total of the down votes is more than the up votes, curation is figured for the side with the most weight!
Can you imagine the epic flag wars?
Fought for money by the greedy.
Bread and circuses, seriously.
However, I think it is time for hive to show some maturity.
Time for our largest stake holders to show that they have more than milking the reward pool for all it is worth on their agendas.
Have we collectively learned that it can't be all for one, if you want others to play your game, too?
Instead of building defensively to mitigate the damage of abusers, let's incentivize abuse hunting.
The number of abuse fighters are small.
They mostly want to earn rewards, too.
This can benefit the ecosystem, if we let it.
