For scientific research workers, whether it is a graduate student who is at first glance, or an expert or scholar who has become famous, the first step in research is to find the problem under study.
The research begins with the problem, and before it becomes a problem, it needs to sort out its background and related knowledge, so that the problem is clear, clear, focused, and has the feasibility and necessity of research.
The whole process is the process of research review. The comprehensive is to organize and collect, and the analysis is analysis and clear. This part is crucial for research work, which determines whether research is necessary or not.
Here, for the literature review, provide the following methods:
As I said before, research begins with problems. A good research topic is usually generated from concerns about real problems.
However, it is not enough to focus on it, but also transform it from everyday language into research. This subject must be a clear and clear question with relevant academic significance, otherwise there will be no research value.
Moreover, the smaller the problem, the better. The smaller the problem, the easier it is to go deeper. The more you can see it, the more you can see it. Avoid large and broad, not only difficult to study, but also easy to float on the surface. Studying a problem at a time is enough.
Using scientific language, refining questions, and choosing academic opinions is the only way to establish research topics. Only when the problem is clear can the research have a foothold.
Once you have identified the problem, you need to have a comprehensive understanding of it and to clarify the current situation. You need to collect relevant information, literature and other information.
When searching, you must read, select, and organize the data, distinguish it, and make quick choices. Find the most powerful data arguments that can support the topic and prepare for the next argument.
Document search will not be a once-and-for-all process, and it may be repeated many times in order to get the results you want and get the information you need. It takes patience and care.
At this point, we begin to enter the theme, and we must demonstrate the problem of the established problem. To successfully the subject of argumentation, it is necessary to establish and present a demonstration plan to prove the central argument.
The argumentation program shall make reasonable logical arrangements for the arguments, and organize the collected and selected materials to become the subject of evidence. Only credible and truthful arguments can make the argument convincing, and only a logical and rigorous argumentation process can make the argument impeccable.
Tell everyone, why is your problem worth studying? And find a reason to prove worthwhile.
This step is to focus, synthesize and analyze the collected data to establish an inquiry-based argument.
The purpose of the literature research is to find out what the current research objects have been, what achievements have been made, and where to go, so as to decide where to start.
More importantly, all materials are reviewed to make evidence and form an assertion. Grouping according to the combination of time, theme or time and theme, and then constructing the reasoning form and chart, forming a preliminary argument, laying the foundation for future papers.
Questioning is the premise of research. Reading the literature with a critical eye is a must-have for a researcher.
Criticism is an art that interprets literary, scientific or technical works. It is not a simple subjective criticism, but consists of a series of well-founded arguments, and the argument comes from the detailed analysis and evaluation of the works.
To criticize the literature, it is necessary to explain the existing knowledge and explore how the knowledge answers the research questions. Always ask yourself, can I answer my research questions with my knowledge? If the answer is clear, then the purpose of doing a literature review is achieved.
All the previous work must eventually be merged into a result, and the form of the result is a text composed of words that can be read by others.
And this work is a work that requires a lot of effort. Need to integrate the entire process, rebuild the logic system, and clear the logical focus. Maybe you will keep reviewing your manuscript until it is fully approved.
So far, the process of completing a review has been fully presented. Maybe there is something I can't understand, it's normal, because I can't expand all the details here. But at least, you should have formed a rough outline, which is enough.
The full text is complete. Thank you for your patience to read, if you feel a little value or inspiration, please forward your support.
