Okay...here is a link to take your mind in a productive direction:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/hard-problem-of-pure-consciousness-samkhya-dualist-ontology/F35ED2075EC7FB739607DDBC24FD7A95

Some pertinent points:
This produces a dualist ontology in which consciousness is not associated with the body....

Mental awareness (buddhi), which is a property of materiality, cognizes itself as the whole truth, but it is only one part of the ultimate truth of a dual reality.

I’ve said in a previous blog on Samnkhya that, in a way, Daniel Dennett is right that mental awareness is epiphenomenon, but he doesn’t go the extra step in realizing supernal consciousness, he thinks it does not exist.
Which is why, of course, when I’m at the bar I ask for a ‘double dualist’...That is delineations between mental awareness and pure consciousness and that material world and the pleroma (fullness)...

But maybe this is too much for a traumatic state of being in which case I’d prescribe a donut!