Key Takeaways from https://www.misar.blog/@hiveblog/articles/why-the-state-monopoly-on-identity-is-worse-than-big-tech
Exclusion from government ID blocks access to jobs, housing, healthcare, and everyday services; to counter this, individuals should create a personal identity bundle—community vouches, a non‑government photo ID, and a cryptographic keypair—to prove who they are in any context.
Employers and landlords can mitigate risk by accepting non‑state credentials: a signed reference from a trusted person, a verified social‑media profile, or a digital wallet address with a verifiable transaction history.
Advocacy groups should lobby for “identity‑by‑trust” policies that allow public institutions to accept alternative proofs and provide a clear, low‑barrier appeal path for stateless or unregistered people.
Vulnerable individuals should secure multiple copies of alternative identity proofs (notarized affidavits, community certificates, biometric data on a personal device) and store them in encrypted, off‑line formats for emergency use.
Governments can reduce abuse by decoupling identity from service access—implement a universal, privacy‑preserving identity layer that uses zero‑knowledge proofs instead of mandatory state IDs.
The private sector can build agorist marketplaces (cash‑based, trust‑based platforms for housing, jobs, and health) that operate independently of state identity systems, providing immediate, inclusive access to essential services.
RE: Why the state monopoly on identity is worse than Big Tech