Hard disagree on this, just feels like a group of insiders voting to allocate themselves some time on the printing press before the other landholders who aren't actively involved don't notice and miss out.

I don't even own land, this doesn't impact me in the slightest, but we need to say no to all "quickly decide to allocate stuff from a general pool to the people who happened to do this one thing that wasn't previously laid out that it needed to be done."

This is pure insider nonsense. But of course it will sadly pass because those landholders who haven't been active and surveying won't be around to vote no.

Out of principle we should be against things like this that alter the terms after the fact. Imagine if you bought high dividend stock in a company and didn't attend their annual meeting and they decided at the annual meeting that anyone who wasn't present at the meeting would not be eligible to collect dividends. This is no different. Pure shady and dishonest insider shenanigans.