Your text invites me to reflect on several profound aspects related to the nature of problems, the value of subjective thinking and the relationship between what we consider relevant and what really matters.
𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 “𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀” 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘀: 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲'𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀. 𝗜𝗳 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁, 𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 “𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺” 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲, 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲. 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀. 𝗜 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗿𝗴𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝗼𝗳 “𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀” 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘄𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗲 𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗹 𝘂𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱.
𝗧𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗼𝗿 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲. 𝗘𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗺𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺, 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗲 𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀. 𝗔𝗰𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗿𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘀 (𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗵𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝘀) 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲. 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝘆 𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵𝘀; 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗯𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘃𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗵𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀.
𝗤𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗵𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀, 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗽𝗵𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆. 𝗥𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲. 𝗦𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 ‘𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲’ 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀. 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗹𝘆. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿.
𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗱, 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝘄𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗮𝗽𝘀, 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀, 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿𝘀.
"𝖨𝗍'𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝗎𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖻𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗄𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎, 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗒 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗒 𝗂𝗍."
Friedrich Nietzsche
RE: No F*cks Given