RE: RE: Conspiracies Are Not What They Seem - The Vibrational View
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Conspiracies Are Not What They Seem - The Vibrational View

amico(67)
Published in
GEMS
Words
139
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

I wonder why you keep using the term collapsed? Does that mean you haven't looked at and understood the evidence?

The twin towers did not slam to the ground.
If they had slammed to the ground:

  1. There would be over 1,250,000 tons of debris piled on the ground;
  2. Manhattan would have been flooded;
  3. The seismic recordings would have reflected two 500,000-ton buildings and one 230,000-ton building slamming to the ground.
    None of the three facts happened.

I strongly suggest you to deep understand WHAT exactly happened at the WTC on 9/11
My preferred evidence exposition is, in addition to the WDTTG book, the following video:

I hope you can notice many evidences that lead to exclude a lot of false theories that do not coincide with the evidences of the happened events.

A huge hug! 🤗

@amico: I wonder why | Ecency