Super interesting read! So cool to see your name in a journal. I'd love to hear your thoughts on futurism and transhumanism.

I find that controversial issues with concerning implications (like transhumanism) can send activists in a tailspin. Like literally, so much spin gets added and then speculation becomes reality. Sometimes I see Whitney do that when she talks about all the connections within the CIA to billionaires, bankers, government officials, celebrities, etc.

The Rockefeller and Hubbard link indeed raises some eyebrows. With a brief glance through the article though, it seems that all the information he gathered was synthesized through his own biases and beliefs. The article didn't feel both/and or even balanced. For example, some of Hubbard's perspectives are fascinating and carry significant meaning. HeartMath is an incredible concept and technology. Esalen Institute has hosted many alternative thinkers for workshops and events. Thinking that excludes something entirely doesn't feel trustworthy to me.