I have been suggesting that We stop consenting to the psychopathic legal/governmental system, stand on Ethical ground, and consent to a vastly better way of doing things, for a fair while now. It would seem Most don’t grasp what this means in daily life. And so, I hope to explain this so Others can grasp.
The first step is to announce that You withdraw consent from that whole ghastly system. Announce it on the web, to friends and family, in print, in any way that many Others know You do not consent. This will establish witnesses and records of Your withdrawal of consent.
You also want to establish that all dealings with the system are done under duress only. Place the statement that You are doing whatever it is You are doing “legally” under duress in every document You are involved with. State that You are enduring things under duress when stopped by a cop or other “official.”
Of course, You are responsible for Your choice of behavior, and if You choose to break the three Laws of Ethics, You are subject to any Ethical consequence. You can’t steal something and say You don’t consent to the legalates that make that a crime. It is a crime under Natural Law, expressed as the three Laws of Ethics. Those three Laws are:
And You are under
Once You have withdrawn consent, do not do anything the legal system “demands.” Like sign documents, show up to court, and etc. Explain that the documents do not apply to You if offered in person. Explain that You are sovereign, and as long as You choose Your behavior Ethically, no One has any right to harass You.
Any court summons should be returned with a letter stating that all dealings with the legal system are done under duress and the all-caps name is not You. (And in fact, it never was – it is the “strawman” that They convince You IS You, but the legal system cannot deal with flesh and blood Beings, only legal fictions, and so They trick Us from a very young age into thinking that JANE DOE is the same as Jane Doe.)
You can state in Your letter that, as They are summoning a non-corporeal entity, an absurdity, They can consider that the non-corporeal entity is present, an equal absurdity.
But in general, go about Your business. Don’t worry about it. Just be aware of things You might do to help create the better You consent to.
Personally, as I do not consent to slavery by virtue of accounting for My energy added into that system so that I can survive, I do all things money under duress. It is because I know that tool is archaic – We have had the tech for at least 50 years that would make accounting for Our energy pointless – and extremely dangerous for Humanity – it will promote the psychopaths to power, which We can see clearly is the case today – that I do not consent to energy accounting, do not consent to the use of money in ANY form, from trade/barter on up to electronic bits (see “Is Money Evil?” below).
But what better is there to consent to? Here I offer a way We can remove the wage-slavery, the oppression, and the psychopaths’ control, along with other vids and articles with more information:
We Have Psychopaths in Control:
What Happened When Money Went Away:
I do hope You choose to be a part of the aggregate coming together to co-create this better way upon Our planet.
__________________________________________
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
