What I want to know is why the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette's work, subquantum kinatics (SQK) is ignored...
His work, where He used an "as above, so below" approach, taking chemical kinetics and dropping them to the subquantum level, has no ad hoc additions, like the einsteinian bunk ("dark matter," "dark energy"), no "renormalizations" (where the math goes to infinity and reality does not), has no "mysteries," and... Is euclidean. No ad hoc "bending of spacetime."
And... It predicts the energy in the aether. Oh. Wait. I think I know why His work is ignored... LOL!
SQK: https://starburstfound.org/category/research/subquantum-kinetics/
RE: Neils Bohr Won, So Why Don't We Teach Quantum Physics?