RE: RE: Neils Bohr Won, So Why Don't We Teach Quantum Physics?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Neils Bohr Won, So Why Don't We Teach Quantum Physics?

Words
99
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6M

What I want to know is why the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette's work, subquantum kinatics (SQK) is ignored...

His work, where He used an "as above, so below" approach, taking chemical kinetics and dropping them to the subquantum level, has no ad hoc additions, like the einsteinian bunk ("dark matter," "dark energy"), no "renormalizations" (where the math goes to infinity and reality does not), has no "mysteries," and...  Is euclidean.  No ad hoc "bending of spacetime."

And...  It predicts the energy in the aether.  Oh.  Wait.  I think I know why His work is ignored...  LOL!

SQK:  https://starburstfound.org/category/research/subquantum-kinetics/
 

@amaterasusolar: What I want to | Ecency