Back in the day, many, many years ago, I remember the big brouhaha They made about how cannabis – marijuana, and even hemp – was evil and deadly. In the congressional record it was claimed the weed caused “…brother to kill brother.” All kinds of other untrue claims were made. Violence and mayhem were the things They claimed it caused, which, if You know its real effects is quite funny.
But for many reasons They wanted cannabis out of the way back then, and so the lies flowed in congress to support making it illegal, and even putting it on the “most dangerous drug” list.
Why would such efforts be made for an herb that creates calmness (treats stress – which is what “recreational use” is really doing), relieves pain, helps with insomnia, reduces or eliminates epileptic seizures, keeps Alzheimer's at bay, helps with multiple sclerosis, and a host of other treatments for illnesses, and…
Can be used for textiles, plastics (stronger than steel!), paper, oil and fuel.
Who would possibly want that weed gone? Who would choose to make such a useful plant illegal, and to the point that having a seed of the plant could put You in jail for a decade and more? Who was so worried that such drastic measures seemed the solution?
Cotton growers? Yes. Cannabis made stronger and more durable fabrics and other textiles, so They surely did not want the competition. The newly burgeoning plastics industry from petroleum surely did not want the much cheaper and stronger stuff around that could be made from cannabis. The forest owners, whose trees made paper for profit, wanted the less pricey paper gone so They could profit.
The Rockefeller oil empire, making oils and fuels, did not want the less expensive oil and fuel options out there! Did You know that Henry Ford made a vehicle entirely out of hemp, and ran it on hemp oil and fuel? Needless to say, Rockefeller surely had motive to remove this renewable source.
And… The petro-”medicine” industry, the pinnacle of Rockefeller’s production, where all “medicine” (p-HARM-aceuticals) is made from His pumped-out oil, surely had a vested interest in removing the medicinal plant from competition.
So it made sense, with all these industries threatened by a plant from which cheaper, more effective, and higher quality products could be produced, that the efforts to criminalize cannabis were made. And I would think there’s still a threat to them all, but…
Recently, with little fanfare, some states, like New York, have made it legal.
Why? Why would They be moved to legalize this threat to so many moneyed industries? Why now allow this “scourge” to flow – freely in one sense, not so freely in another? What is the motive to make the threat more of a threat?
Well…
First, I want to establish My expertise in the effects of cannabis when smoked. As Many will know, I have lived in pain since the age of six when I was given a shot to protect Me from DDT (They said it was for “polio” – which is caused by DDT). Sometimes a lot of pain and other times just sort of a background ache, but always, always, pain.
So back in the ’70’s, when I was told that it helped with pain, I tried it. And… Indeed, I felt much better. I was able to function more efficiently. I actually felt good. And so, I continued to use the herb.
For 50 years I have used it, grateful for the relief and clarity it brought. In its illegal state, it was grown organically, from “heirloom” seeds (seeds not tampered with). Though there were reports of Some choosing to lace the herb with other stuff, I never encountered that, and I would think that would just add to the expense, making it less optimal.
And so I ponder whether those reports were sandy hooks to dissuade People from using the plant.
I did a lot of research on the herb, and ran into studies that showed that, unlike the chemical-soaked tobacco, cannabis did not damage the lungs, and in fact, though statistically insignificant, the long-time users that did not smoke tobacco showed slightly larger lung capacity than non-smokers. Holding deep breaths for a while enhances the capacity of the lungs.
Beyond that, there was virtually no detriment.
A bit ago, someOne said online that cannabis caused the heart to race. I flatly denied that! I had been using it for a long while and never experienced that. I thought it odd, in fact, that anyOne would say such a thing.
My supplier had quit the business to move to another country, and when I ran out of My stash a few weeks ago, and since now I can go to most smoke shops and buy the bud, I chose to do so.
I ground the bud, stuffed some in My pipe, and smoked.
Almost immediately My heart began to race! I was aghast! How could this be? I had never experienced that before… Why am I experiencing it now? And then it dawned on Me…
The psychopaths in control never give freedom back with no strings attached. I had known that They were messing around with the genome of cannabis for a fair while, and so, likely, with the rapidity after legalization with which the stuff showed up at the smoke shops, I have to give fair probability that They found a way to make the herb unhealthy, produced a bunch and got it ready for the quiet legalization. Kinda like They prepared jabs for the unicorns They announced.
There’s also the possibility They added something, sprayed on, or whatever, to the buds They’re now selling. Maybe even nanotech. Who knows? The psychopaths would not balk at anything They thought They could get away with. Psychopaths are, after all, psychopaths.
So now I ponder how to obtain unadulterated medicine. Yes, this new stuff helps with the pain, but the heart racing just cannot be good. It sucks when One is homeless and nigh destitute, using a medicine that the psychopaths have diminished.
And I ponder whether that One who came about claiming that cannabis made the heart race was there to normalize what They have done to the blessed herb.
We Have Psychopaths in Control (8 min):
Learn About The Human Psychopath (38 min):
What Is a Psychopath? (6 min):
Are You A Psychological Child? (article): @amaterasusolar/are-you-a-psychological-child
Why Does Money Promote Psychopaths? (article): @amaterasusolar/why-does-money-promote-psychopaths
Lip Service to Freedom (article): @amaterasusolar/lip-service-to-freedom
We Have to Do This Ourselves (article): @amaterasusolar/we-have-to-do-this-ourselves
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
