I have spent several years now studying all I can about how They find viruses, and contagion – and the effectiveness of vaccines. What I found, I think, is vastly more important to know than what lipstick Zelensky is wearing today. It should go viral!
The first thing I discovered what that the virologist say We can’t find a virus straight from the sick One. They can’t just take blood or tissue from someOne who is sick and then isolate the virus. They say the virus is “too rare.” And I have to ponder, if it’s so extremely rare, why is it making anyOne sick???
So what They do to “find a virus” is take tissue from the sick One, put it into a dish with all kinds of other stuff which poisons the cells and starves the cells. And, as the cell dies, it opens up, and out come particles. They take pictures of this dead cell debris, draw arrows pointing at the bits of debris, and then claim it’s “the virus.”
I also discovered that this same process was done with cells from healthy Individuals and… They got the same result!
The healthy cells emitted dead cell debris that looked identical to the “viruses” They get from sick People. And I can’t help think that the process does not show viruses at all. Just plain old dead cell debris. Nothing more.
I also discovered that They (the researchers into all things genetic) have seen, with microscopes, the genetic material from virtually all species of critter – macroscopic to microscopic – that We know of on Our planet, and yet, no One has seen the actual genetic material from any (proclaimed) virus. Not one!
Instead, what They did was gather bits of genetic material They found floating about, put the sequences of these bits into a computer, stitched them together by taking any ends that matched and deciding the matching ends were a single representation, adding to the first piece and then on down the line.
This in silico (in a computer) construct is then called “the [fill in a name] virus genome,” and patented.
Well. None of this looks at all rational to build a theory of something that causes Human illness and death. It looks more like someOne(s) had an interest in creating fear. Fear based on a lie. Fear that could be used for control. Oh, but surely there’s no One on the planet that would want Us in fear and thereby controllable!
Oh wait… For some reason I am thinking of John D. Rockefeller. Hmmm. Oh! That’s right! He wanted to make a petro-”medicine” (“medicine” made from oil) for all ills, and the more ills He had, the more “medicine” He could sell (profit motive – such a grand and noble thing…). So the “deadly viruses” theory was of interest to Him.
He had purchased schools, publishing, research labs, and media, and let loose a barrage of propaganda claiming a virus in every malady, and the cure was His oily brew. But it went one step further. This baptist psychopath saw how the fear in Us was ramped up at the mention of “deadly viruses.” And fear is a psychopaths favorite tool (beyond money, which will promote psychopaths to power).
He used this fear in 1918 to vast advantage. The “flu” then killed the jabbed, not the unjabbed (this is starting to sound familiar…).
He was teaching germ theory (which included viruses) in His schools, publishing, and media. He would pay other schools to teach the germ theory and only the germ theory, and would pull any funding from any school that mentioned terrain theory.
Terrain theory is the theory that what makes Us ill (outside of injury) is one of two things: too much of something (toxicity) or too little of something (deficiency). And in fact, many illnesses have been shown to have one or the other of these vectors. Scurvy, initially thought to be some bug, was found to be a deficiency of vitamin C, for example.
Antoine Béchamp, a leading proponent of terrain theory at the time the moneyed psychopath Rockefeller was pushing germ theory, was doing experiments and countering Rocky’s claims. Rocky ensured that no One heard His side, or the results of His experiments. Money buys the most delightful things…
(Interestingly, I just did a search for Béchamp, to ensure I was spelling His first name correctly, on DuckDuck and got no returns. I switched to Yandex and He popped right up. Oh, They didn’t try to castrate Him from the web, I’m sure… Psychopaths with money who aim to create fear would never do that!!!)
Amongst Béchamp’s efforts in the battle of the theories was to try and prove contagion. He tried and He tried. Hundreds of well People were subjected to the sick, and try as He might, with sick People sneezing, coughing, and spitting into the well’s mouth, and other things were tried to get People sick...
Zero of the well fell ill. Zero, nada, none, zip, zilch.
Later experiments by military and Others had the exact same results. They even injected the well with the blood and the mucus of the sick. Thousands more, altogether, were experimented on, and the total sum of People falling ill was… Again, zero.
But, but, but… Didn’t Pasteur prove contagion? Rocky’s pal? I know He did! The history books say He did! Oh, wait… Pasteur kept a record of all He did, and His journals were published posthumously. In them, He admitted that He added toxins to what He used to “prove” contagion, because just subjecting well People to sick People was not working. They all knew back then that contagion was a debunked theory, but Rocky wanted that for a vector of fear.
So He had Pasteur devise “experiments” that would “prove” contagion. They did nothing of the sort. But they were heralded far and wide by Rocky as “proof.”
So… Where do I place probabilities? How probable is it that viruses exist? That contagion is real?
Given what I have found out, given the efforts of psychopaths to create a false narrative to manipulate Us, given the lack of evidence… My probabilities that there are such things as viruses and contagion approach zero.
And with that data set, I look to the latest plannedemic. The fact that deaths in 2020 were running just under 2019 until mid-December when the jabs rolled out (at which point there was a spike), given flu deaths up to 2019 were in the many hundreds of thousands a year, but in 2020, they dropped to fewer that 2,000, and the rest were filled in with the crown bug invasion… It is clear They rebranded flu – a seasonal detox – to get the fear rolling.
And “They” are the psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money). They are clearly out to reduce Our population. And it’s not because We are some scourge upon Our planet, but that there are too many of Us for Them to control 100%. They want Our numbers way down. And the jabs are one of Their major vectors.
Like it was in 1918.
And so… We might consider a solution to psychopaths being in control on Our planet. And there are two elements that will promote Them to the top. When We eliminate these things, psychopaths will have no handle on widespread influence, being equal in power to You and Me, and will have to do any dirty work personally.
The first is controlmind (“government”) and its supporting structure called the “legal system.” Any time We consent to being ruled by Others, giving Them powers We do not have, psychopaths will be drawn to that power like flies are drawn to feces. Psychopaths lust – and I do mean lust – for power over Others. Give Them power over compliant Ones and They will take it in a heartbeat.
We can withdraw Our consent from being ruled. We can stand sovereign on Ethical ground (under the three Laws of Ethics only). We can deal with the legal/governmental system under duress only. We can protect Ourselves and Others from bullies – whether in costumes or not – as best We can. And We can consent to and help co-create something vastly better.
The second is money in all its forms that account for Our energy added (as slaves must) into a system. From trade/barter on up to electronic bits. Clearly no plannedemic would have happened if there was no way to buy complicit People to sell the lies. As money, at its foundation, accounts for Our energy added into a system, adding free energy technologies would make accounting for Our energy added pointless.
To both ends, I offer some short videos below, hoping You watch them first before commenting (the titles may make You think something else is offered…).
The Detailed Blueprint (for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns) (7 min):
Electrogravitics: Gravity Control & Energy from the Aether (9 min):
The GentleOne's Solution (7 min):
Collectively or Aggregately? (4 min):
We Have Psychopaths in Control (8 min):
Self Defense and Ethics (3 min):
__________________________________________
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on YouTube). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
