First, to address the authority issue: Robert Malone claims to be the inventor of mRNA technology. It is easy to research this claim and discover it is a misrepresentation of reality. An accurate statement would be: he worked on mRNA technology. So have many other people. Notably, his work was done a long time ago (about 20 years ago) and there were 20 years of further research after him before mRNA vaccines were successfully created. Nor was he the first to work on mRNA. His move to grab the spotlight now in a hot area of research that he basically abandoned is pitiful, in my opinion.

But to be fair, let us divorce the argument from the problematic presenter. Also, I do not have the time to analyze his numbers and calculations for accuracy, so lets further assume they are accurate.

But even accepting all his calculations at face value for the sake of argument (which I do only reluctantly after having listened to previous analyses from this guy that I judged to be biased), there still remains a fundamental weakness in the above argument: it analyzes individual outcomes in a vacuum. If all these people got vaccinated, transmission would be dramatically lowered (almost eliminated entirely, in fact). This would result in a huge overall reduction in covid cases among the entire population (and therefore a much better average health outcome for everyone in the population). From my point of view, the inability for a scientist to miss this obvious result demonstrates a less-than-towering intellect.