I do not. But the weird thing is how many voluntarists and anarchists were easily fooled by a stupid and very obvious authoritarian like Trump, just because he paid lip-service to their beliefs . Maybe

I'd say America has taken a turn leftwards, seeing as Trump is sidelines and the Republicans lost both houses of Congress You have totally misunderstood American politics if that is what you think. Eventually

While it does seem very likely that Ventavia was guilty of slipshod work, the claims by Ryan Christian at the top of the video about some associated grand conspiracy and fraud by FDA and Pfizer are completely

Yes, because the conviction of a single washed-up pedophile is far more important than signs of rising right-wing fascism in the most powerful country in the world. After all, what could go wrong?

I hope you have misunderstood his statement, because looking at his picture, he looks very old for a 20 year old. I believe he is saying that he has been a professional artist for 20 years, not that he

Is the vaccine really safe? Virtually everyone I know in real life has had at least two does of the vaccine. Some of them felt bad for a day or two, but in all cases it was nothing serious. Personally

A crypto guy without a VPN? There are free ones like but I don't know if it works fast enough for video.

They're so funny I took the time to find a few of them for you (they are really short): And not a contradiction one, but still funny:

No, Fox talking heads have railed against any vaccine mandates of any sort, long before Biden's recent mandate. Think back to all the complaints when hospitals were requiring medical workers to be vaccinated.

Our magnificent account was bestowed nearly $400 for this literary masterpiece (at the time of writing). At less than 950 words of his own creation, it means that he most deservedly received more than

I've responded to this with my other comment, but since you actually bring up this point twice, you apparently really do think there is some significance to this. Do you disbelieve all reporters because

This discussion wasn't about the origin of Cov-19. His post was about NIH and Gain-of-Fuction research. There has been discussion about the origins of Cov-19. This was not a post about that topic. I'm

Whether or not such research constitutes 'gain of function' is purely a legal and scientific question, it has nothing inherently to do with conspiracy or theory. Yes, the question is a factual one, but

Yes, when I share a link, it is parroting. When you share a link, it is research. Check your bias at the door. As to why the definition is being edited, I hope we can all agree it is because of political

You are right that he is not a virologist or immunologist, but how many of them would know the ins and outs of the legalities of bioweapons development? Probably not many, whereas he literally wrote the

What I found was not pre-determined opinion, otherwise I would not have bothered to look it up to start with. @ural-soul 's original argument about the guy's expertise sounded like it might have some strength

The author of the world and US bioweapons legislation, Professor Francis Boyle, himself has looked at all of the public documents on this and stated that this work constitutes Gain of function. Never heard

Letters made public between the NIH and a US politician reveal that, despite claims made that the viruses that (were ADMITTED) to have come out of the research were too distant from SARS CoV2 to have been

Thank you for link, will read up on it.

It's a good question, but is there still time to discuss exactly how that would work?