RE: RE: Important Change to STEMGeeks being considered
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Important Change to STEMGeeks being considered

Words
196
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

well, first of all, thanks for all the work put into StemGeeks.

imho:


"Should we make this change?"
definitely, 100%. StemGeeks has its own token, economy and it sounds reasonable to reward those who are closer to the community.


"What percentage 10% - 50%?"
I am for 50%.


"Where should those rewards go, null or community fund?"

I am for "...put them into a community fund that is used to reward STEMGeeks.net users".


I'd like to ask about
"The STEMGeeks team already has a significantly sized Bounty fund that is used for promotion, prizes, and hiring help."

--> "...and hiring help."

What do you mean by that?

Is it about

https://steemit.com/stemgeeks/@stemgeeks/bring-someone-posting-good-stem-content-to-stemgeeks-and-get-500-stem
"Bring someone posting good STEM content to STEMGeeks and get 500 STEM!"

"Find someone publishing quality content about Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math and get them to make a post on StemGeeks."

"If you successfully onboard a new user, "

My question is

How should one prove that it's he/she who brought the user to StemGeeks?


I'm currently a student at the leading university of my country and have a great opportunity to promote StemGeeks among other students and teachers.
thanks

@alexbiojs: well, first of | Ecency