Its wild to think that this is a discussion that still needs to be had; games do obviously come from and for a place of entertainment, but as we went from squares and pixels after the Atari and NES into having far more potential for storytelling or just increasingly better presentation with each console generation, there's things that games started offering that transcend beyond the games themselves, like the visuals, music, and stories.
So in a way...games can HAVE many forms of art that are combined to form something unique and interactive. If THAT can't be called art, then I don't know what is.
...Also there's indeed something magic about dances too, as I only know a single "cool" dance move but it never fails to impress whenever I pull it off on a party (lol), but coreographed dances and breakdance stuff in videos is a treat to behold as well with how...well, you wouldn't see yourself doing stuff like that, would you? In a way, games also do show some reflection of skill and stories from players themselves with crazy things they can do in them (like the iconic "Let Me Solo Her" in Elden Ring not only being a madman beating one of the toughest bosses butt-naked...but doing so by breaking in other people's games and then leaving).
RE: Are Games 'Art'?