Schools Guns and America and The N.R.A.

Can anything be done to stop the killing of American youth due to gun violence in their schools?

Washington has so far been unable to put an end to mass shootings at American schools, or even curb it: Why? I think it is because the NRA has bought and sold our government for their own benefit. They hide behind the second amendment with the fantasy that we the people need these fire arms so that if need be we can stand up to our government to defend our way of life. Much like what Americans did during the civil war. Are we as a country so naive to think if a few hundred of us or a few thousand of us showed up to the white house, to congress or any town, U.S.A.; fully armed that our Government would allow that? Come on now really. S.W.A.T., F.B.I. and the National Guard and the National Reserves would surround these armed Americans and their guns and shut that down very quickly.

Here in America we have The Bill of Rights which is a list of 10 limits on the government's power.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

What the Founders saw as the natural right of individuals to speak and worship freely was protected by the First Amendment’s prohibitions on Congress from making laws establishing a religion or abridging freedom of speech. For another example, the natural right to be free from unreasonable government intrusion in one’s home was safeguarded by the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirements. Yet there are plenty of examples of where The government have side step or eliminated these rights at will. Look at what Trump just signed an executive order aimed at making it easier for churches to participate in politics, The order, Trump said, removes the financial threat faced by tax-exempt churches from the Internal Revenue Service when pastors speak out on behalf of political candidates.

Yet our government has pass laws that counter act this very statement. Republican state legislators across the country are advancing bills that would criminalize or penalize some public protests. In North Dakota, where protesters occupied land around an unfinished section of the Dakota Access oil pipeline, Gov. Doug Burgum (R) on Thursday signed four laws that would stiffen penalties against protests.
Arizona Republicans have introduced a measure to expand racketeering laws, which target organized crime groups, to include rioting. The bill would allow police officers to arrest and the seize the assets of those who organize protest events.
“Robust protest activity is a sign of the health of our republic. Our democracy is literally designed for citizens to get out in the streets and make their voices heard to their legislators,” said Lee Rowland, a senior attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. “To see legislators in these states make it a priority not to listen to the voices of their constituents, but to silence them, is deeply troubling and fundamentally un-American.” Rowland, who has been following state legislatures for about a dozen years, said the measures represent a “fairly unprecedented level” of action against protesters. The wave of bills come after high-profile protests including the Occupy movement, Black Lives Matter, and the Women's March on Washington, which took place the day after Trump’s inauguration.

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

House Republicans have voted 235-180 to overturn an Obama administration that blocked Social Security disability recipients with mental disorders from buying guns. Less than two weeks into Trump's presidency and Republicans have given the mentally ill easier access to guns. So it seems when motivated The U.S> Government has no issues with side stepping or abolishing our bill of rights. when it suits them. That in no way means it suits "We The People"
All told, 205 members of the House and 42 members of the Senate received cash from the gun rights group. In the House, 16 Democrats and 189 Republicans received a contribution from the NRA; in the Senate, 4 Democrats and 38 Republicans got cash from the pro-gun organization. To see the full article please go to http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-money-congress-republicans-2012-12

The National Rifle Association uses campaign expenditures and a rating system based on members' voting histories to exert influence over members of Congress. The NRA grades candidates based on their voting record on gun issues or on a questionnaire.

A+ "Excellent voting record" and "vigorous effort" on gun rights.

A "Solidly pro-gun," backed NRA on key votes or has positive record on gun rights.

AQ Pro-gun rating based solely on a questionnaire and without a voting record.

B May have opposed "pro-gun reform" or backed some gun restrictions.

C "Not necessarily a passing grade." Mixed record" on gun votes.

D "Anti-gun" supporter of "gun control legislation" who "can usually be counted on to vote wrong on key issues."

F "True enemy of gun owners' rights."

Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Yet again the U.S. government side steps this right with the U.S.A. Patriot Act. (“Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism ) its authorization of indefinite detentions of immigrants; the permission given law enforcement officers to search a home or business without the owner's or the occupant's consent or knowledge; the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order; and the expanded access of law enforcement agencies to business records, including library and financial records.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Again the Patriot Act side steps these as well . A perfect example is The Guantanamo Bay detention camp. Which is a United States military prison located within Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, also referred to as Guantánamo or GTMO (/ˈɡɪtmoʊ/), which is on the coast of Guantánamo Bay in Cuba. Since the inmates have been detained indefinitely without trial and several inmates were allegedly severely tortured, the operations of this camp are considered to be a major breach of human rights by Amnesty International.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Guantanamo Bay detention camp could be considered outside U.S. legal jurisdiction, The administration asserted that detainees were not entitled to any of the protections of the Geneva Conventions. Ensuing U.S. Supreme Court decisions since 2004 have determined otherwise and that the courts have jurisdiction: it ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld on 29 June 2006, that detainees were entitled to the minimal protections listed under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. Following this, on 7 July 2006, the Department of Defense issued an internal memo stating that detainees would, in the future, be entitled to protection under Common Article 3. In January 2018, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to keep the prison camp open indefinitely.

Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

There are just far to many examples oh how this has been side steps but a a couple that stand out are the cases of Jeff Mizanskey and Anthony Kelly.

Bill of Rights 1.jpg

Jeff Mizanskey, a Missouri man who has served 21 years of a life sentence he received for a series of marijuana offenses.
In 1984 Mizanksey sold an ounce of pot to a police informant, which led to a search of his home that turned up eight more ounces. Seven years later, acting on a tip that Mizanskey was selling pot, police obtained a search warrant and found less than three ounces in his home. In 1993 Mizanskey went to a motel room with a friend who planned to buy a few pounds of marijuana. The supplier turned out to be another informant cooperating with police in a sting operation. Under Missouri’s “three strikes” law, those three felonies triggered a mandatory life sentence. As Malin observes, Mizanskey “never hurt anyone, never brandished a weapon, and never sold to children.” Yet he was punished more severely than many rapists and murderers.

Bill of rights 2.jpg

Anthony Kelly, likewise was convicted of two minor cocaine offenses as a young man—the first at 19, the second at 21. Four years later, he was visiting a family friend when police searched the house and found 21 small bags of marijuana, totaling about an ounce, in a toilet. A detective accused Kelly of trying to flush the pot, which Kelly denied. That was his third strike.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Yet as I have shown you, when the governments wants to side step the bill of rights they do. So why then can they not do something with our gun laws or lack there of. But for some innate almost primal belief "It's My God Given Right" ideology is reverberated time and time again. I really hate to break it to ya but I don't think our forefathers or God would agree.

Time and time again we hear these same old arguments that seem to bastardize the true spirit of the second amendment. If we look at the second Amendment it states: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
The U.S. government find it easy to deflect any real conversations on gun controls or any laws that limit or restrict any American from owning any type gun and having stock piles of ammo.

Until We The People Of The United States Must Demand the N.R.A. be removed from any contributions to any political candidates on any level we will never even stand a chance on any kind of reform or any kind of real gun control laws here in the United States. How many more children/people must die?