A lot of accusations flying around lately so I thought I'd make it clear what's up and at the same time maybe encourage more people to help crowdfund our game! (shameless selfpromo as it's launched fairly with no founder/team shares)
It votes for posts that contribute to the community, whether it being fanart, artwork we plan on using in different ways in the future, discussions about the project, and some smaller votes on random posts about it.
The size of the vote mostly depends on the effort and quality behind the post and how much we believe you're contributing in genuine ways, i.e. no plagiarism, AI generation, spinning, tracing, etc. Author rewards are never guaranteed, some times we may vote things too low, some times too high and some times we may skip a post unfairly while other times voting some posts that we find out later we should not have voted. That's pretty much the curation-game between author and curator.
We have a 10% beneficiary set up to the community as stakeholders in the past have mentioned it'd go against the spirit of curation if we rewarded our curators/moderators/abusecheckers with upvotes - in general that's okay for hive communities not related to us and benefitting hive as a whole, but since this is for a specific project that doesn't pertain all stakeholders we understood the difference and accepted to do things differently here. Some projects may give their curators a vote on their post, some may pay them with curation rewards directly. Since curation rewards are however and were for the longest time our main way to fund the project, we decided to do 10% beneficiaries. The beneficiaries are enforced by asking authors to accept it when posting into the community, they go towards 
Since the game is not released yet, naturally not a lot of posts can be created on a daily basis about it, while a majority are artwork related due to the rich idea behind the game, we make sure not to deplete all our voting power on the community. Even though as you can imagine it'd be in our best interest to spend as much voting power as possible on posts within our community due to the 10% beneficiary, we try not to overreward posts and spend a large amount of votes on 
What we don't do
and I guess this is important to note due to recent events where I've been involved trying to break up certain vote selling services.
We don't upvote people based on delegations, meaning going out and voting delegators on random posts, whether they're related to our project or not. They already receive zing tokens for their delegations and that's all they'll get. Naturally this would also be in our best interest to "keep delegators happy" by giving them a vote, but that'd go against curation. Some times delegators may also post about our project but this does not impact how big of a vote we give the author. I had to also ask my curator to stop voting up my holozing own posts so people wouldn't see this as a "double-dip" scenario, even if my post maybe was worth the extra curation from the account.
We don't accept tokens in exchange for votes.
We don't curate people based on how many tokens of our project they hold.
Selfvotes on 
Lastly, we're all human so there might be certain votes that we subliminally or due to prejudice/other judgements may vote more or less on certain posts/authors - I don't think that's something that can be perfected, but we try to keep hive curation separate from the project itself.
Anyway.
If you like the idea of
Thanks for reading! Sending half of the rewards to
PS. Forgot to note: We may also vote some 
Recently we also throw some votes on very good 
