I upvote what I consider to have value.

Yet you can't fathom why people downvote things? The literal opposite?

I'm baffled how someone behind one of the currently most popular tokens (according to hype, I don't care much about its current price) is spending all his time defending someone who's pretty known to be an asshat dramaqueen who's mainly just been complaining for the past few years why he doesn't get upvoted and most content was about that to then get overrewarded and instantly turn the content on why people are disagreeing with the rewards. For someone as intellectual as he tries to make others believe he must be really self-destructive to manage to get more people to disagree with any rewards he may get.

Reading your comments lately I find it really, really obnoxious how against downvotes you are, reminds me of the old korean stakeholders at the presentation they held on steemfest. You also seem weirdly obsessed with defending the same user you're giving most of your rewardpool to. Since your tokenomics are similar to BTC, imagine if such a big part of the early mining had gone to someone as unstable and obviously in it just for the money as lucy instead of making sure it has a wide distribution without favoritism.

Edit: I see now it wasn't your votes in the screenshots above but other stakeholders. Seeing as how against downvoting you are and allowing blatant votetrading to occur I'd stay far away from investing in that token.