After reading the rest of the post I also find it super childish that you come to random conclusions of who could be who and downvoting based on guesses. If you think something is over-rewarded then downvote it and leave a comment stating so, but trying to turn this into a "war" and lashing out on random innocent users will only hurt your stake. There's nothing more disgusting than seeing a small korean account follow your judgements on what should get downvoted and when you look at his account he is posting original content but not receiving curation because you guys are too busy voting on yourself and other big stakeholders. It is a damn shame how you decide to use your stake when you could be doing so much good with it and on top of it lash out on people doing so because you don't get to farm a higher ROI than the rest of the platform.

On top of it all you keep saying we are profiting from downvoting, are you serious? You do realize the way downvotes work is that they make all other upvotes worth more for the whole platform. I could've easily not done any downvotes since the EIP at all but I decided that's what's best for Steem and it's rewards pool, had I done so I would continue earning post rewards like usual and just watched others get into wars, etc. This is not fun for me nor is it rewarding and I assume it's not fun for you either, so do the right thing, use your stake for curation instead of voting on your alt accounts and there won't be any downvotes.