The foliowing questions and thought I didn’t know of until i read Dr Judy Wood BS, MS, PhD book “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?
The World Trade Centre did not collapse. The towers didn’t have sufficient time to collapse because they were destroyed faster than is physically possible for a gravity driven collapse. This rules out conventional controlled demolition, where a building is knocked of its supports and thereafter slams to the ground.
The World Trade Centre was built on bedrock and protected by this underground “bathtub” seven stories blow the surface. This enclosure some people call the “slurry wall”, held the Hudson Rivers water away from the foundations of the World Trade Centre Buildings. According to Wall Street Journal architecture critic Ada Louise Huxtable, this structure saved lower Manhattan from the waters from the Hudson River. And to the relief of engineers, the 70 feet walls were not damaged or breached and continue to do its job prevented flooding.
Information based on seismic wave recorded at Palisades New York. “Collapse 1”, WTC2 magnitude 2.1 duration 10 seconds. “Collapse 2”, 2WTC1 magnitude 2.3 duration 8 seconds. “Collapse 3”, WTC7 magnitude 0.6 duration 18 seconds. If we look at he Seattle Kingdome March 2000. Built of reinforced concrete, stood 250 feet tall and weighed an estimated 130,000 tons. The implosion created the equivalent of a magnitude 2.3 earthquake and duration of 52 seconds, with no vibration damage to adjacent structures. By contrast each twin tower weighed an estimated 500.000 tons and 1362 feet tall.
When buildings are demolished using Conventional Controlled Demolition preparation must be made. Anything that can be removed must be removed, so that they don’t become deadly projectile. As a result, there would have been a greater number of projectiles ejected from the buildings. The World Financial Centre building 2 (WFC2) directly across West Street from WTC1 appeared undamaged beyond the broken windows, damaged facade and the missing marble at the entrance.
In conventional demolitions, when the supports are blown out by explosives, the debris and dust goes down and the highest point of the dust cloud does”t go much above the height of the original building. The dust clouds produced by the destruction of WTC went up in contrast to normal controlled demolition.
http://www.pbase.com/watson/image/536207/original
The towers did not “collapse”, they already turned to dust before hitting the ground. The official story maintain the towers hit by aircraft and the subsequent fire weekend the steel near to the top of the buildings, initiating a gravity driven pancake collapse. There are some problems with this hypothesis. First being the most obvious is freefall speed at which the buildings were destroyed, the lack of remaining materials and debris and how many pictures of pancaked concrete floors have you seen of the WTC buildings.
Where did the two towers go?
I looked and said, “Guys, there used to be 106 floors above us and now I am seeing sunshine”. Theres nothing above us. That big building doesn’t exist. These are the biggest office buildings in the world and I didn’t see one desk or one chair or one phone, nothing. Jay Jonas (firefighter, survivor in stairwell B north tower)
If the buildings had been blown up with explosives, 500.000 tons of debris from each of the tower would have slammed to the ground. And if it had been a collapse then we would have seen steel upon steel and debris, not dust. WTC buildings were gone. The minimal debris remaining could not represent 110 floors of steel and concrete and other office building materials.
My thoughts are with the victims, survivors and their loved ones
The links are to the images from Judy Wood’s book, some no longer appear to be working.
