"- you are questioning the truth of my fictional analogy? -"

Not exactly, I realize it's a fiction, but it doesn't seem very illustrative to me by virtue of being nearly nonsensical. I gather it's meant to be an allegory for climate change but it seems to me such a distorted caricature as to be rather impotent.

Also, I was previously aware of both biotic and abiotic chemistry that can produce oil deposits. Given life's prodigious ability to catalyze reactions and the timescales involved, it's to me puzzling this denial of the biotic pathways for oil creation.

Lastly, I'd like to note I have no love for the West or it's philosophy. In fact I find many of the notable tenets and philosophers to be contemptible, but I suppose one could find contemptible elements in many sets with enough analysis.