Content Checker
| Category | Percentage |
|---|---|
| AI-generated | 9% |
| AI-generated & AI-refined | 0% |
| Human-written & AI-refined | 0% |
| Human-written | 91% |
| Plagiarism | 29% |
| Exact Plagiarism | 29% |
| Partial Plagiarism | 0% |
| Unique | 71% |
Only 9% of the text is likely AI-generated, while the majority (91%) appears to be human-written.
The content mainly reflects natural human writing patterns, personal expression, and authentic structure. A very small portion may resemble polished or predictive AI-style phrasing, but there is no strong indication of heavy AI involvement.
Overall, the document is predominantly human-written, with minimal AI-like traces.
The scan shows 29% exact match content from detected online sources, while 71% remains unique. However, the matched source appears to be a duplicate/front-end mirror of the same original post published on another platform.
Since the detected match comes from the author's own republished content (mirror source), it should not be considered actual plagiarism. No meaningful partial plagiarism or copied third-party material was found.
Overall, the document can be considered original self-published content, with duplicated indexing caused by multiple platform front-ends rather than unauthorized copying.
RE: My Success Party as A Doctor