RE: RE: Personal Preference Bot Nets and The Quantification of Intention
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Personal Preference Bot Nets and The Quantification of Intention

RE: Personal Preference Bot Nets and The Quantification of Intention

@dcsignal First off allow me to apologize. There literally was no intent on my part to offend or to offer an ad hominem in any form. This is mature discourse.

The example was intended to convey that what at one time seemed like something that humans "ought" to be doing, is now something that we do infact rely on technology for.

Automation of dull repetitive tasks is a synonym for AI. It's just the degree of inference that really makes the difference.

Look forget the word AI in any of this. It paints too broad of a swath and frankly we'll never have AI because we keep moving the goal post.

I have a phone and I'm sending you a message. You have a phone and your phone is aware that you are presently at work. Instead of "i'll text you".
I just decide I'm going to send you a message and let the phones sort out the details.

The only thing that is happening is that when it comes time for message delivery, your phone tells my phone "He's in a meeting right now, would you like his email address instead?"

What you are automating away here is the receptionist who would be doing this task. You don't need to be shoehorned in and frankly if people like dana and myself are doing our jobs correctly you should never ever feel that way.

Just like you used to program your phone with speed dial settings, and keep a Rolodex for less frequent numbers. You now have a contact list built into your phone. You already have the ability to put your phone on meeting mode and in most cases it will direct calls to voicemail automatically. So you tell your phone, "Hey I'm in a meeting now". Your phone then reports back to my phone the way that you would prefer to be reached.

It's not just that no one is forcing it on you. It's that it should be at least as natural a tool to use as another human being. That's the I in AI here. You're literally surrounded by it. Your microwave has a popcorn button right now. But really good microwaves could scan the UPC as you're putting in the bag and find out what the correct settings are to pop your popcorn to optimal efficiency. That doesn't mean that you wouldn't be able to stop it on your own though.

@dana-edwards I do wonder if maybe dropping the term AI and using more precise terms might be in order. Automated Assistant. Independent agent system, support vector machine, software based remote controller, might help people digest these topics easier without being biased because of the movie view.

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
Join the conversation now
Logo
Center