I'm sure this post will also be ignored
You really can't come up with this.
One of the best examples of this is:
I repeat:
At the moment, there is no incentive at the moment to reveal security exploits, and you would be better served selling the exploit on a zero-day exploit market for at least $10,000.
Or placing a short and revealing it to bitcoin magazines - and writing a clear medium post with source code so that someone can execute it.
Why is it that the only person who has worked on a ticketing system and a central information hub is @gabi-dumitriu?
And why is it that for his work, he only received $370 - for creating an entire steemit tailored social media site with integrated support ticketing system - in a post that was nested in an hour?
Why does it make sense to promote fluff content over security?
It doesn't.
Do you realise how much Facebook invests in security?
A lot more than on promoting Bitcoin strippers, marijuana and lolcats.
As it stands right now, we have no recourse to developers when we encounter issues, nor do we have recourse when we want to announce vulnerabilities.
With all the millions developers have made can they not invest in basic central support, or at least reward those who provide this infrastructure appropriately?
And actually promote the use of the infrastructure
Can they not have a full fledged bounty program so that people can expect appropriate reward when revealing exploits?
Case study (short):
Ethereum foundation made millions, no security audits, no full fledged bounty program.