Disclaimer:
I’m heavily invested in NEO, and have a project based on NEO blockchain o3 - A NEO wallet app for iOS
I’d like to take the time out to respond Investor Warning: Major NEO Redflags. I consider this to article to be the embodiment of FUD, as the author does not do due diligence and has a clear, undisclosed conflict of interest on the subject that he is writing on.
So let’s go through the points.
The first point starts off with a factual error. The author points to the NEO network monitor for the 13 consensus nodes, but the funny thing is these aren’t the consensus nodes. Although these are constantly syncing they are not participating in the consensus process, but merely acting as peers in the distributed network.
We’re running two of them ourselves at
node1.o3.network:10332
node2.o3.network:10332
Here’s a conversation that further illustrates the point.
Yes the NEO foundation is currently running the consensus nodes. Anyone who has done any due diligence will concede that point. However there is a proposal to move away from that.
Read the section Decentralization of Consensus Nodes listed here
So from the beginning the author has committed factual errors on what the NEO network is and what it isn’t.
They then states
The whole point of cryptocurrencies is a decentralized validation system where anyone can operate nodes and validate transactions in the network.
I’m not sure what makes him the authority on what a cryptocurrency is and what a cryptocurrency isn’t. The point of NEO is to obtain voting rights and receive GAS that is generated/distributed on the NEO network. The point of GAS is to pay for contracts and transactions on the NEO blockchain.
Furthermore, I believe that distributed systems are bound to become semi-centralized over time. Think about the gold standard of decentralized cryptocurrencies; Bitcoin. People already complain about mining centralization, development centralization, and exchange centralization. If we are to accept that this will be the end result of a blockchain cryptocurrency ecosystem, then there are technical tradeoffs that we can make to achieve things like faster transaction speeds, which is exactly what NEO does. So no, YOU may think that the point of a cryptocurrency, but running a validation node is not the end all of cryptocurrencies. In fact you probably know yourself that the majority of bitcoin users do not run validation nodes.
So while you can make some good points about the centralization of NEO, claiming that using dBFT as a consensus mechanism, which inherently limits the amount of consensus nodes, defeats the purpose of a cryptocurrency is merely an opinion.
Valid point. It should have been better communicated to users in the ecosystem. I’ve personally been affected by this lack of communication when RPC end points change without me knowing. However, I’m ok with the network going on standby to reduce the risk of losing half a billion dollars.
Frankly, this point is just stupid. If the protocol is good it will gain adoption based on the technology, not on the trading volume. Using trading volume as a reason to bash a project is shortsighted thinking at best, and at worst….I’ll restrain myself. If the currency has volume and the network is being used, I don’t care if its happening in Antarctica. The whole Ethereum of China thing was never propagated by NEO or CoZ devs anyway, I think anyone that is serious about NEO would be ecstatic if this label was dropped.
NEO is not the Ethereum of China
NEO is NEO which is a beast in its own right
Yes NEO is an open source project, which means that anyone can choose to build on the platform. If amount of scammy ICO’s was somehow a negative indicator of the project than Ethereum should be worth nothing right? I don’t know much about Adex, but as for Aphelion there were plenty of posts about the potential risks of investing in Aphelion, which you even stated yourself in your article. Most people that posted about Aphelion on the NEO subreddit got down voted into oblivion. Whether or not they will be successful remains to be seen. It is not the place of the NEO foundation to comment on projects that they are completely uninvolved in, as this would be unprofessional behavior.
I do not consider an ad hominem attack on an open source project a valid argument.
Usually not a fan of this, but the NEO foundation is very restrained about what they choose to announce. Whether or not this was a good move or not remains to be seen, depends how juicy the announcement is.
Before I move on to the last point I want to address the obvious conflict of interest in this article.
It’s been stated in their twitter that the author is a holder of QTUM
and he has previously made articles shitting on NEO
NEO vs QTUM: An Objective Comparison
My response to this is fine, feel free to shit on any currency as you see fit, but at least have the decency to acknowledge you have a financial conflict of interest on the subject matter.
Finally
Really?
I’m collecting GAS every day.
I’m querying RPC nodes every day.
I’m running and maintaining nodes.
I’ve seen contracts deployed by a growing open source community.
And I’ve invoked those smart contracts.
NEO Transactions Per Day (A conservative estimate)
(5 per block) * (20 sec block) = 21600 transactions per day
Everything seems to be working to me.
If you’re a NEO fan, please help show your support by signing this petition.
Petition · Apple: Allow The O3 Wallet Back On the App Store · Change.org
