In January 2020, a sequence of events unfolded that defy reason, leaving us to question whether we witnessed an orchestrated ballet or stumbled blindly into a global pandemic. As we peel back the layers of this bewildering timeline, a tale of criminality, planning, and staging emerges, challenging the narrative that dismisses it as mere coincidence or incompetence.
It all began with an unusual report from a Chinese eye doctor on December 30th, claiming a discovery of atypical pneumonia. In a country where pneumonia was no stranger, this case was deemed peculiar.
Fast forward to January 5th, and the World Health Organization boldly declared the identification of 44 cases of atypical pneumonia with an unknown cause out of a population of eight million. A mere five days from the initial report, and the mystery was supposedly unraveled. A new SARS-like virus was the culprit, they claimed.
In a blink, the gears of the machinery were set in motion, a firm was miraculously manufacturing the first PCR kits to test for this mysterious virus. The timeline was absurdly tight—11 days from the identification of the first patient to the shipping of testing kits.
On the same day the PCR kits embark on their global journey, the first gene sequence of the virus is published on firelogical.org.
Just two days after the gene sequence revelation, the World Health Organization embraces a PCR protocol as the "gold standard" for testing. The speed at which this protocol ascends to such prestige challenges the notion of scientific rigor, evoking a surreal sense of orchestration.
In a mere 12 days from the identification of the first patient, the infamous Corman-Drosten protocol was submitted for review. Astonishingly, 27 hours later, it was peer-reviewed and published in a journal where Drosten held editorial sway.
As if scripted, a Chinese study detailing clinical symptoms related to COVID graces the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine. The theatricality of unveiling specific symptoms within a month of the virus's identification adds another layer to the surreal narrative.
A mere five days later, the first study on asymptomatic transmission emerges in the New England Journal of Medicine. The plot thickens, and the storyline appears crafted, leading one to question the authenticity of each plot twist.
In a compressed 26-day timeframe, a new clinical manifestation is introduced, a virus sequence is unveiled, a diagnostic test becomes the gold standard, and clinical features are etched in medical history.
As the world grappled with the chaos of a burgeoning pandemic, questions loomed over the authenticity of the narrative. Was it all a grand conspiracy, a meticulously planned act? Or a chaotic emergence of events, a cock-up of incompetence and happenstance?
The Dubious Genesis of COVID-19
Amazon’s Mask Usage Prediction in January 2020
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Amazon foretold an increase in demand for face masks through its forecasting algorithms. By studying data and historical models, the firm was able to predict how critical the matter would turn out, thus placing orders from distributors for quick response to customer requirements. Consequently it is not surprising that Amazon as a symbol of technological innovation and vision embarked on an ambitious project which used Artificial Intelligence (AI) to deal with growing needs for protective masks.
footnote: this article was AI assisted