Pick was described as "...a bachelor ... uncommonly correct in clothes and attitude (source)."

He entered the University of Vienna in 1875, and was quite skilled in both math and physics, later being certified to teach in both areas. Pick studied or worked with many a notable mathematician of his day, but his claim to fame was being the driving force behind the committee decision to appoint Albert Einstein to the University of Prague.

Pick and Einstein were colleagues, friends, and even passionate musicians.

Not only did they share scientific interests, but they also shared a passionate interest in music. Pick, who played in a quartet, introduced Einstein into the scientific and musical societies of Prague. In fact Pick's quartet consisted of four professors from the university including Camillo Körner, the professor of mechanical engineering. (source)

Like many an artist, Pick never got to live to see his formula achieve the status it has today. It was not really received with much attention at the time, and sadly Pick died an early death in a concentration camp during World War II.

As for what made it popular?

The result did not receive much attention after Pick published it, but in 1969 [Hugo] Steinhaus included it in his famous book Mathematical Snapshots. From that time on Pick's theorem has attracted much attention and admiration for its simplicity and elegance. (source)

Seriously though, how does this thing work?

To prove Pick's Theorem, we need to make a case for "easy" shapes first. Shapes like rectangles and triangles. Then, we will expand our focus outward to any polygon.

Generally speaking, we will show that when Pick's Theorem is applied to a shape, it will yield the same formula we are used to for that shape.

Case 1: The Rectangle

Ahh, the nice, friendly rectangle. This is the easiest case to understand because of the way we can nicely count boundary and interior points.

Boundary points are given to us by finding the perimeter of the shape. Interior points are determined by multiplying one less than the dimension of the base and height by one other. If we take the general expressions for each of these for a j x k rectangle and substitute into Pick's Formula, we would expect to get the area formula for a rectangle, Area = j * k.

Spolier alert: We do.

Case 2: The Right Triangle

The right triangle can be thought of as a general case of a rectangle, just cut in half down a diagonal. Again, we desire a relationship between interior and boundary points that would show a generalized area formula for a triangle, A=(1/2)bh.

It gets tougher to count boundary points this time because of the diagonal. It does take a little mathematical poking and prodding to reveal the points on the hypotenuse, those that are not the endpoints anyways. We have to determine this by finding the greatest common factor of the dimensions of base and height and subtracting 1.

For a j x k rectangle in general, this will make our formula for boundary points:

Remembering that a right triangle is half of a rectangle will assist us greatly in finding interior points. We take our previous formula for a rectangle, (j-1)(k-1), subtracting x points on the diagonal that weren't part of the rectangle formula, and divide by 2.

Great! Now let's piece these two formulas together and see if we get the area formula for a triangle, (1/2)*base*height

SWEET!

Case 3: The General Triangle

We are starting to loosen the reigns a little bit here! If it wasn't already with our last example of the right triangle, it is going to become painfully obvious that if we are going to solve a complicated problem, we have to start solving a series of easier problems first. Namely, compare every possible triangle back to the easiest shape of a rectangle.

If we do this, we start to reveal really cool patterns like the one below. We take our desired yellow triangle T and make a rectangle out of it by surrounding it with two others that would all sum together to a rectangle.

Note here, we will define A1 and A2 as the areas of the two right triangles that surround our general triangle. Here, we would love to show:

And, we already know that for A1 and A2 Pick's formula holds, as they are right triangles and we have already shown that result. We also know for the overall rectangle Pick's will hold as we have shown that as well. Therefore, we can utilize Pick's formula for each of the shapes in our diagram as follows:

Remember that for the jxk rectangle, the area will be jk, the boundary points will be 2j+2k, and interior points will be given by (j-1)(k-1). Putting this all together carefully with our prior definition of boundary points for the longest side of right triangles yields:

Counting interior points carefully of the rectangle, and subtracting 3 because the corners of the triangles are double-counted, will yield:

Now, we substitute equations and solve! Our mystery triangle? Turns out Pick's Formula applies for it as well.

Other Shapes?

It turns out that since every two dimensional polygon can be partitioned into triangles, Pick's formula holds for them as well.

If you can get on the first step and can show you can get to the next, induction would suppose you could get to every step on the ladder. Our "easy" cases from earlier were the base case steps that enabled us to show Pick's Formula held. To show others, you just need to handle how any shape in general could be split into the basic shapes from the base case. I submit this excellent paper as proof, if you so desire to see.

__

So, next time you see an unfamiliar shape, put it on a lattice.

Impress your friends and family with your new found knowledge. Because when they are scrambling with rote memorization of area formulas from the ghosts of Geometry classes past, you will be the Usain Bolt of the formula world.

Want to play around more with Geoboards and lattice polygons? Try this tool here! It is also how I generated many of the polygons you see in this post.

Image Sources

1. Georg A. Pick
2. Pick's Examples
3. Concave/Convex Polygons
4. Thumbs Up GIF
5. Partitioned Triangles
6. Usain Bolt By Erik van Leeuwen, attribution: Erik van Leeuwen (bron: Wikipedia). - erki.nl, GFDL