When such a truth is revealed, it generally happens without fanfare and skipped under the rug by the MSM, that is precisely why we have to trust these raw confessions. What scientists say behind closed doors and getting little attention "versus" what they say to the media is very often contradictory.
Nor do we not expect any big pharma apologists to support naturopathy either. Ultimately the pharmaceutical industry is a cartel and many insiders and professionals will try to defend it no matter what, just for the sake of their reputation.
It is like Fauci who penned an article saying that covid19 was not worse than a bad flu but then called for lockdowns on TV: Dr. Fauci, whose guidance to President Trump has resulted in a near total lockdown of the country, recently published an editorial in New England Journal of Medicine.
BIG critics of alternative medicine pledged alliance and want to float the idea that big pharma can be reformed (protecting the criminals). What we cared about in this article is that big wigs belonging to the industry just confirmed what is happening today in broad daylight.
Also please note that they know that the solution is to end competition in science fueled by incentives and recognize that 'collaboration' is what will keep the field trustworthy, and that alone is a HUGE piece of data exposing the fallacy of our system itself. A full-fledged system change is what will save our planet!
The more we compete for financial freedom, the more we spread servitude because such a mindset disconnects from the Whole that wants us to remain inter-dependent. And that means that individualism works against the Laws of Nature. That it is all about control and we need a massive wake up call so that REAL science can take over.
The Problem: Skeptical of medical science reports? (2014)
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine” (1). More recently, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote that “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2).
Individuals and organizations considered responsible for the present state of published medical science include researchers, journal editors, reviewers, granting agencies, governments. Horton goes on to reflect on whether the bad practices can be fixed (2). He concludes that scientists have incentives to be productive and innovative but no incentives to be right. He muses on the removal of incentives, emphasizing collaboration rather than competition
We believe that the sciences are being constricted by dogmatism, and in particular by a subservience to the philosophy of materialism, the doctrine that matter is the only reality and that the mind is nothing but the physical activity of the brain. We believe that the sciences would be more scientific if they were free to investigate the natural world in a truly open way – without the constraints of materialism and the prejudice of dogma – while adhering to the scientific methods of data collecting, hypothesis testing and critical discussion.