<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></title><description><![CDATA[RSS Feed]]></description><link>https://ecency.com</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 23:28:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ecency.com/hot/pangram/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Pangram AI detector: is Substack’s new scanner accurate?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Substack’s Pangram scanner looks far stronger than older AI detectors. So why can its “100% AI” verdict still tell the wrong story about who wrote a post? Read the full article on Popular AI]]></description><link>https://ecency.com/@popularai/pangram-ai-detector-is-substacks-new-scanner-accurate</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ecency.com/@popularai/pangram-ai-detector-is-substacks-new-scanner-accurate</guid><category><![CDATA[pangram]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[popularai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:21:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://i.ecency.com/p/NTy4GV6ooFRmaCXZ8UYgPhoud1kjiNX8QokLEZtbBKLuLWQ9yt7K3o4S896uvt8XBr4hwp9jHrveR1HVZKuGDnYao6xNjzBSDtWTVDMeThR3XnHcbJbkXvWAtHBFj4tNSRpqbgZsHAofNkxUzSvk1p6xQfN81CHJ8x25qGjg?format=match&amp;mode=fit" length="0" type="false"/></item></channel></rss>