Two worlds



yuvBQowcRaTSo5Lg_IMG_8445.webp
4OaHOTRbhJB7Ciqc_IMG_8407.webp
FWlv6k1akXcD50KD_IMG_8390.webp
swnv41I5rQFftR0K_IMG_8250.webp
NPeheEixCupuClwP_IMG_8252.webp
Lfuh98CgQhVjMtz4_IMG_8330.webp
iqZcQeCNmsedTYZB_IMG_8370.webp
IoVXbPfUdVosOjAq_IMG_8373.webp

A few days ago I took these pictures for my best friend. They are the result of a long debate we had, and today I am sharing our thoughts with you.

The problem is that we understand nature as everything that comes from the creative power of the universe, plants, animals, etc.. However, we tend to exclude ourselves from this classification. Sometimes we see natural processes as part of something alien to us, without understanding that we modify everything in our path. And this is also natural.

We have the ability to evolve and govern ourselves according to our own laws. Many of these we have only copied from the environment that surrounds us. The results of our creations are also part of these components that we find and manage to mix to give them new ways of existing. Societies and cultures have evolved and spread, creating nuclei with their own unique characteristics. All other inhabitants of the Earth are marked by our presence and progress. Is this not natural?

We have arrived at very separatist definitions that end up being pure contradictions over time. In every photograph we see the coexistence of the anthropogenic and the natural as part of a whole. As life itself manifests itself cyclically on each thing that makes, the passage of time achieves a perfect union between the "two worlds".


H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
5 Comments
Ecency