Let me apologize at first to the community admin @acidyo, because my post is going to be broad. I don't know if I'm going to break the rules below.
No loaded questions with your bias/opinion already in the body or title
And secondly, I apologize to some more people (Whose posts I read regularly) whom I am tagging in this post. I really want to see their opinion as a senior on this blog.
Let's hope at the main point.
Today I made a funny comment on someone's post. But I was not ready for the reply I got. It was a reply from a frustrated user.
Her complaints about the hive community were severe. Although most of them were unreasonable, I countered them. I tried to motivate her, as well.
But some complaints I could not ignore. Really!
I have seen this in a few communities. Let me quote it again, in a few communities. Some users and curators work in a circle, and provide upvotes for their own posts from their own curation trail.
If the post was excellent, that was one thing. But whatever it is in the post, day after day some shit posts are getting non-stop big rewards.
But there is no better post evaluation in the same community. Other users are struggling with better posts.
When a blogger analyzes all day and posts a great picture, video, drawing, or research, and sees that the lousy post is getting a much better response than that. Can you think of his state of mind then?
Nothing but frustration. And at the end of the day, the Hive will lose a talented blogger because of this frustration. Bad posters will remain in his place with his continuous shit-posts.
It looks like for the first time, I'm going to get a lot of downvotes.
I have been saying what I have learned from my analysis. I could be wrong. So I want to know your opinion on this matter.
Why are some shit posts getting more rewards than better posts?
Is Hive Blog taking any action in this regard?
Special Tag - @abh12345 @delilhavores @tarazkp @syedumair @themarkymark @theycallmedan