Democracy is the freedom of the people to make decisions. It is in the POB community that is being used for decision-making. Which can help you make the right decision.
@trostparadox has been posting proposals for muting for many days. He made last proposal post 8 days ago. But many have abstained from voting.
Many have voted. They did not vote for various reasons.
- It could be a barrier to freedom of the downvotes
- Muted users may be harmful to the POB tribe
- Users may refrain from various good uses of the downvotes
- Investors may be worried about POB
- Protesting against spam will be a problem
- The subject of muting has been disputed
- It can turn the proof of brain into Blurt
Some people have expressed their views against muting by posting
Downvoting Proposal on POB - Why I vote No to the Proposal by @scooter77
Vote No to the PoB Downvote Proposal by @melbourneswest
How does muting work with tribes? by @themarkymark
@clixmoney said on his post
Anyway, I like to see a clear picture of all this. I didn't participate in the proposal, not only because it has a lot of rules and stakeholders may be muted. But I didn't participate in this proposal because why the vote should consider the stake in a poof of brain tribe? Can someone explain to me now why I should participate?
Proof of Brain proposal with Proof of Stake vote !
Many have expressed their views in the comments.
@onealfa.pob has been voting NO since the early time. He was never in favor of this proposal.