I think that's a difficult argument to make- we are in a transitionary period between the two and I don't see any reason to make that transition more difficult or slower than it needs to be. How did web 2.0 manage to get so many users if they weren't trying to attract everyone? If users are on board and wondering why their content isn't earning they are likely to try to learn why. If users are on board but see that their earnings are being manually limited by community members they are more likely to leave the chain with a bad review and take that bad review back to web2 which continues to slow the transition.
Crypto users are bad at this- we believe we are on the frontlines of something- it makes sense to us- and we are used to some of the hurdles. We are not always the best at explaining things for new people and we need to get better about it. We should be encouraging people to join us not making it difficult for them.
Hive is big enough and complex enough that new users are easily overwhelmed just by the onboarding process nevermind tags, frontends, posting conventions, the variety of tokens, and all the rest. It wouldn't hurt us to be tolerant of more traditional content and educate people in the meantime as we grow and continue the transition to web3. If we can't manage that as a community then companies like Facebook(META) and Reddit will transition towards Web2.5 (as they already are- they see the opportunity) and they will manage to keep their userbases. It will become much more difficult to convince users to make the jump to true web3 when they will probably be able to earn from the content they are used to posting on the platforms they are used to using.