RE: RE: 10, 372 - Part Two
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 10, 372 - Part Two

RE: 10, 372 - Part Two

It’s a bit cryptic, I know, but it’s the essence of the posts so I thought it’d make for a good title.

The number, when referencing CK levels, is definitely high, although I’ve heard of numbers higher than that, and from what I’ve read, those numbers are usually highest around ages two and three, so I can only imagine what they would’ve looked like if we’d connected the dots earlier.

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
Join the conversation now