Well I think my points were currently well explained enough to understand my points and I don't pretend to make you think like I do, so should you.
It's clear enough that in terms of sustainability and ecology, our actual human system on many fields, food sector included, is not sustainable nor even healthy and many more things. So maybe we'll change that someday but as far as one already caught fish is going to be thrown to garbage in the fish market, I prefer to buy from there before being thrown to garbage than killing a wild and free one, actually. But your point about not contributing to the actual food sector or industry is absolutely right, it's just it's hard to help all the things involved in all this machinery.
You prefer killing man over killing animals? I can not believe you think that way. Sad.
I don't like to kill anyone, but from that point of view of psychopaths making suffer animals on purpose or killing species near extinction just as trophies, I point out that humans are much more large in number and many of those humans, less valuable to the world and to their own society than some valuable wild animals, wich perfect fit into Nature designs, thing that doesn't happen with human species, overpopulating the world and killing the planet itself; so, answering your question, yeah, it would be nice to control human population and I won't miss the loss of some specimens of human species.
Human species must decrease, it's just a must for the planet.
That said, I won't kill anyone to help that but would be nice to start with those trophy hunters I referenced above 😄
Just my personal opinion.