Moderna rats lost pregnancies at double rate of placebo

If you've been paying attention to the increase in the experimental vaccination programs pushed forth by governments, you'll notice that there recommending pregnant women receive the shot now. Many women think they're actually protecting their child by getting this experimental injection. But is that really the case?

I've mentioned before how Israel had the chairman of the ethics committee resigned in protest due to the government's refusal to inform people of the risks of the experimental injection. Especially since the documents of the manufacturers of the experimental injection themselves say that their product has not been tested for safety on pregnant women. I think the Moderna one states that pregnant women should not be given the shot. What governments and medical experts, who alleged care for your health, no actually care what the pharmaceutical manufacturers have to say about their own product and the safety of it.

Someone recently tweeted a link to the European medicines agency science medicines health assessment report on the Covid-19 vaccine by Moderna. This is how crucial information needs to be spread, because the mainstream media is not doing it. People in social media need to inform each other. But the gatekeepers who control and monitor and police social media don't allow this so they delete the posts and often suspend accounts of people doing such posting.

There tweet read:

Nothing to see here, Moderna addition: like the Pfizer vaccine, the modern_tx asked vaccine led to more pregnancy loss in rat studies (the only studies done). Vaccinated rats lost 16% of pregnancies, double those that got the placebo. pg. 50-51/169.

Here's the part from the doc:

In this study, no vaccine dose was administered during the early organogenesis, to address the direct embryotoxic effect of the components of the vaccine formulation. However, such a risk is considered low in humans, given the non-live organism nature of mRNA-1273 and the low risk of genotoxic effect of SM-102-containing LNP in humans. The overall pregnancy index was numerically lower in mRNA-1273 vaccinated female rats (84.1%), compared to control animals (93.2%), but remains within the Test Facility’s historical control range (low range being 75%).

100 - 93.2 = 6.8
100- 84.1 = 15.9

They repeat this paragraph lower, but state that natural births dropped down to 68.2%.

So thats 100 - 68.2 = 31.8. That's over 4x more pregnancy losses it seems.

But also note how they state their experimental injection using mRNA, has a low risk in humans to have an embryo toxic effect. Because regular vaccines use the actual virus organism, so they consider their experimental injection not fall under the same categories of risk.

I wonder what was in the placebo as well. Because we know that in some of the experimental injection trials, when they were supposed to give the saline injection is a placebo, what they actually ended up giving people as a placebo was another vaccine. This is not a placebo.

So the same could have been done with rats, who received a placebo of a vaccine which still produced pregnancy losses, but it wasn't the experimental injection which produced even more pregnancy losses. A doubling of pregnancy losses. But that's okay, because it's within their own test facilities self-determined low range of 75%. So 84% is acceptable anyways.

None of that matters, because the mainstream media is telling you that "Study: COVID-19 Vaccine Is Safe During Pregnancy And May Protect Baby, Too". So it's totally safe during pregnancy, and maybe it will even protect your baby to, maybe, since it's also may be or maybe not even gonna protect you. But there is demonstrated reports of pregnant women in having stillbirths and miscarriages after taking these experimental injections. But nothing to worry about, you and your baby are totally safe. The Pfizer, Moderna COVID Vaccines Safe for Pregnant Women. Nothing to see here.

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
5 Comments
Ecency