RE: Covid-Con

(not just some scientist in Wuhan at the very beginning of the pandemic)

Of course, you didn’t watch it carefully. Prejudice won’t help you. The interview was done on January 23rd 2021, a year AFTER the ‘many scientists paper show they isolated the virus’. Dr. Wu Zunyou is an official of a Chinese CDC, so he should know if the virus was isolated. But I suppose you don’t believe Chinese CDC? Let’s see who is lying here. How about US CDC as an arbiter? They have posted this Lab Alert at their site:

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

Here is a screenshot in case they have changed something in the meantime:

CDC-Alert-corr.jpg

Another ‘multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses’ means that the current FDA-authorized COVID-19 test could not differentiate between those two viruses, which means the virus is NOT isolated. If you need more detailed explanation, it is at this link:

False papers are thriving in the Coronavirus Hoax. The most known, notorious case is the case of a fake company called Surgisphere, whose ‘experts’ were a science fiction writer and an adult content model! A porn-star! Fake study about hydroxychloroquine that tried to discredit the tested drug was retracted from the Lancet magazine after only 13 days, but the corporate media never published the retraction, and are still citing it. And you still religiously believe those lies without even trying to pose a serious questions?

Ok, so you're referring to an idea that is so uncommon that you can only find it in some special medical book that has been removed from a youtube video? I suggest you read more, watch videos less, if you want good information.

It is not a special textbook – it is a standard textbook from the Medical Faculty of a Belgrade University. And she was also reading an excerpt saying that a natural immunity is always stronger then a vaccine immunity, which means that those who were infected does not need vaccine at all. Yes, this is a book, and I was sending that video because it was the easiest form available for everyone to see. You ask YouTube why they banned it.

And since you love to read, you’ll have to find textbooks in your language, instead of referring to ‘common sense’ you’ve got from corporate media, without asking how common it can be.

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
13 Comments
Ecency